Some quotes and thoughtlets collected over the years. Some are my own, though I don’t know which ones exactly – over time it has all got mixed up in my head.
From Roshan to language designers of the future, on the topic of programming language types:
If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.
(adapted from Douglas Adams).
I just fixed the last bug!
Any sufficiently advanced bug, is indistinguishable from a feature.
-- quoting Prof Andrew Lumsdaine, Advanced Operating Systems (P536)
Marvin: "I am at a rough estimate thirty billion times more intelligent than you. Let me give you an example. Think of a number, any number."
Zem: "Er, five."
Marvin: "Wrong. You see?"
The mattress was much impressed by this and realized that it was in the presence of a not unremarkable mind.
-- Douglas Adams, Life, the Universe and Everything
Life! Don't talk to me about life.
Ok, so what the answer?
Its 5,1,1,3,2…
No, no, no, I don’t like it..
You don’t like it?
It doesn’t mean anything, what does it mean?
Now that’s a different question.
-- solving the universe selection problem, Quantum Programming
When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.
Would you like tea or coffee?
Mathematician: Yes.
-- quoting Michel Salim
What do you mean its third party fault? I can’t get my work done and you are partying?
It’s an idea so simple, that understanding it messes your mind.
-- adapted from Dan Friedman, Principles of Programming Languages
Creating a great language doesn’t involve assuming that your users are less smart than you.
The language that you use defines what you can most easily think of. Languages instill patterns of thought. Certain languages make difficult the understanding of certain ideas.
A novice was trying to fix a broken lisp machine by turning the power off and on.
Knight, seeing what the student was doing spoke sternly- "You can not fix a machine by just power-cycling it with no understanding of what is going wrong."
Knight turned the machine off and on.
The machine worked.
-- AI Koan
Lambda the ultimate.
-- Dan Friedman
The only law in physics that we know of that has a direction with respect to time is that of entropy.
-- QP class, B629 Computer Science, Indiana University
Accept it. We are Labor.
A style makes explicit what a language makes implicit.
What I was coming to is that its something that cant be expressed in the lambda calculus.
But that’s obvious.
-- quoting Amr Sabry
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.
-- Richard Feynman
This is not even wrong.
-- Amr Sabry
There exists no formal method to convert an informal argument into a formal one.
There exists no reversible classical function that coverts a quantum superposition into a classical state.
-- above paraphrased by Roshan
Misguided rambling from Roshan: Computer Science to Physics and Back Again
There exists no formal method to convert an informal argument into a formal one. This is roughly equivalent to the second law of thermodynamics - the total entropy of any isolated thermodynamic system tends to increase over time, approaching a maximum value. This is also our only formal notion of the quantity called time. Here the law is rephrased as follows and things brings out its directional property with respect time, more clearly - It is not possible for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object. This is roughly equivalent to saying that there is not no notion of a partial computation without a notion of sequencing with respect to time – this is the ‘.’ (dot) sequencing operator of the pi calculus. The lambda calculus does not define sequencing. Are all closed systems pi-systems?
Don’t worry, we are just playing games.
Summary of the known laws of the fictitious universe –
- There exists at least one notion of fundamental duality. Using this all other forms of duality can be derived.
- There exists at least one notion of self referential quantification. Using this all forms of self referential quantification can be derived.
- There exists an order of relationship of things among themselves. There exists an order of relationship of events among themselves. In other words there exists at least one notion of ordering or sequencing.
The Tao that can be described in words is not the true Tao
The Name that can be named is not the true Name.
From non-existence were called Heaven and Earth
From existence all things were born.
In being without desires, you experience the wonder
But by having desires, you experience the journey.
Yet both spring from the same source and differ mostly in name.
This source is called "Mystery"
Mystery upon Mystery,
The womb giving birth to all of being. (1)
- Tao Te Ching, as translated by John R Mabry
All consistent axiomatic formulations of number theory include undecidable propositions ...
Gödel showed that provability is a weaker notion than truth, no matter what axiom system is involved ...
- Gödel Escher Bach, Douglas Hofstadter
Thirty spokes join together at one hub,
But it is the hole in the center that makes it operable.
Clay is molded into a pot,
But it is the emptiness inside that makes it useful.
Doors and windows are cut to make a room,
It is the empty spaces that we use.
Therefore, existence is what we have,
But non-existence is what we use. (11)
The impossible did not bother him unduly. If it could not possibly be done, then it must be done impossibly. The question was how?
-- Long Dark Tea-time of the Soul, Dirk Gently.
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))
If you're going to tell a lie, tell a big one (then nobody will believe it's a lie.)
-- Joseph Goebbels
Is there a name that describes a situation where all parties involved, despite understanding fully or partly the true nature of the situation, choose to play a role until an outcome of the situation presents itself in such a way that it cannot be held the sole responsibility of any of the parties involved?
Why can’t we all just get along?
The average celebrity meets, in one year, ten times the amount of people that the average person meets in his entire life.
-- Jack Nicholson.
Deep down, I'm pretty superficial.
-- Ava Gardner
“One day an evil magician flew over his house and – “
“Just a minute, “ interrupted the king (who was very practical). ‘I didn’t know that magicians could fly!”
“Most of them don’t,” she replied, “but this one did.”
“But how could he?” asked the king.
“Because he was a flying magician,“ she replied.
“Oh, that explains it,” he said. “Go on!”
-- Raymond Smullyan
I agree with you, its just that I am not willing to admit it.
I searched for one of my favorite quotes and found this page. I laughed my guts out for sometime - http://www.corsinet.com/braincandy/explain.html
Fortune has me well in hand, armies 'wait my command
My gold lies in a foreign land buried deep beneath the sand
The angels guide my ev'ry tread, my enemies are sick or dead
But all the victories I've led haven't brought you to my bed
You see, everybody loves me, baby, what's the matter with you?
Won'tcha tell me what did I do to offend you?
-- Don McLean, “Everybody Loves me, Baby”
Ph.D. Haskell programmer - ate so many bananas that his eyes bugged out, now he needs new lenses!
-- Evolution of a Haskell Programmer
(I nearly died laughing on this one – these days I have been trying to understand monads in the context of computational effects and CPS. If you don’t get the reference look here, Erik Meijer’s classic on the ‘Point Free Style’ - http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/meijer91functional.html)
Remember Me
a@href@title, strike
Powered by: newtelligence dasBlog 2.0.7226.0
Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.
© Copyright 2008, Roshan James
E-mail